about a year ago, I scratched a paper, entitled Crime pays, on public-private partnerships that were then presented as an approach economically performance, particularly on their implementation in the penitentiary, through a tender won by Bouygues then to build three prisons and a lucrative franchise of maintaining 27 years ...
Somewhat presciently, it seems that indeed crime pays.
The Court of Auditors has thus make a report pointing the finger at the excesses of private management of prisons.
The menu is derived from the cost of delegated management, strong growth in rents paid by the prison administration to private investment leading to a restriction in other schools and therefore the risk of a two-tiered jail ...
The Court also considers the organization of prison labor by private providers is also proving inadequate, or that the time billed in professional management company is 2.5 times higher than in public management ... Funny, it vaguely recalls the excesses brought about by the privatization of the market for the unemployed benefit of private actors.
And finally, the icing on the cake, private providers have a tendency to overcharge for products offered to inmates in order to clear comfortable margins. The Court, which always put it delicately, believes that "the highest price is the most commonly identified in a facility management company [...] practiced and margins on some products show gains - unencrypted - made by delegates on the work canteen.
Bon ben there was the little paper before the holidays.
On this blog, which you'll easily found, the rate has dropped fabulously, he turned up probably to a retired after 5 years of blogging.
Less than envy or rather the desire to scratch elsewhere, differently, or in other forms.
0 comments:
Post a Comment